FRCS Revision

This site is private

Enter the password to open the revision library.

Personal revision library · not clinical advice
FRCSRevision
Home / Limbs Dysplasia Deformity / Congenital long bone bowing and dysplasia
Limbs Dysplasia Deformity

Congenital long bone bowing and dysplasia

Congenital tibial bowing and dysplastic bone with dense cortex and narrowed medullary canal.

16 questions 3 source pages

Images appear with the first question taken from each source page — tap a question to open it.

16 questions
Q1Describe the clinical and X-ray findings, the diagnosis and its differentials.▸
  • Right leg with abnormal angulation at the distal tibia, apex anterior; no significant angulation on the frontal view
  • Multiple hyperpigmented skin lesions ?scar/cafe au lait spots
  • X-ray: abnormalities of distal tibia and fibula, fracture with ?pseudoarthrosis of the tibia; fibula length normal
  • Diagnosis: congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia
  • Differentials: NF, tibial hemimelia (anterolateral bowing), fibrous dysplasia, trauma with fracture callus, Tumor (EWS, osteofibrous dysplasia, adamantimoma)
Q2What history and examination findings matter in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia?▸
  • Know the age
  • Associated abnormalities of NF and tibial hemimelia
  • Previous treatment
  • LLD, angular deformity, joint stiffness/OA
Q3Describe the Crawford classification and its union rates.▸
  • I: dense IM canal - no brace needed, may never fracture
  • II: widened cortex + trabeculation failure - brace; union rate 91%
  • III: cystic, pre-fracture - early fixation; union rate 75%
  • IV: dysplastic, fracture, cyst, pseudoarthrosis - union rate 70%
Q4What are the general management aims and natural history?▸
  • Promote union -> prevent fracture; correct deformity + equal leg length
  • Natural history: vicious cycle of limb angulation, repeated fracture, LLD, joint stiffness
  • Counsel the family from the outset about the possibility of amputation
  • If pre-fracture: clamshell brace - no evidence bracing prevents fracture or deformity
  • If impending fracture/fracture/pseudoarthrosis: MRI first to see extent and how much to resect
  • Serial observation + bracing until maturity
Q5What is the '4 in 1 osteosynthesis'?▸
  • 1. Resection of pseudoarthrosis + fibrotic periosteum
  • 2. Correct angular deformity: bone grafting, acute shortening, or bone transport
  • 3. Enhance biology: BMP2,7, periosteal flap, autogenous bone graft +/- bone transport
  • 4. Stable fixation with Ilizarov followed by IMN through the ankle joint (often most difficult - William's rod)
Q6What did the EPOS 2000 (Gill) study recommend?▸
  • 340 patients; pre-fracture clamshell brace
  • Fracture -> Ilizarov (provides compression, allows lengthening/bone transport) -> IM nail
  • IM nail options: antegrade rush pin, splint the ankle to control the distal fragment, or William's rod
  • William's rod through STJ and TTJ if <4 years old; proximalise it 2 years post-op if not grown out of the ankle joint
  • Amputate after 3 unsuccessful operations, severe LLD (>15cm) or non-functional limb (Symes, prosthesis protects the pseudoarthrosis)
Q7Why is the Ilizarov frame the method of choice and what are the prognostic factors?▸
  • EPOS study: excellent stability; allows complete resection of the pseudoarthritic area regardless of segment length (lengthening/bone transport)
  • Enables weight bearing, which stimulates healing of bone and soft tissue
  • Can transport the fibula distally to avoid valgus ankle deformity
  • Poor prognostic factors: young age, advanced Crawford staging, NF (not mentioned: fibular pseudoarthrosis); reasonable success between 3-6 years
  • Amputate after 3 unsuccessful operations, LLD >15cm or non-functional limb (Symes)
Q8What is the argument for the timing of surgery in congenital pseudarthrosis?▸
  • Older child: difficult to provide stable fixation in a small child even with Ilizarov; difficult to weight bear with the frame, which is needed to stimulate bone growth
  • Younger child: if delayed, a braced and protected leg cannot develop normally - becomes dysplastic, loses function, shorter from growth retardation
  • Based on EPOS, reasonable success between 3-6 years (the fibromatosis in the pseudarthrosis area has greater osteolytic activity in smaller children)
Q9Bone transport versus acute shortening - what does the EPOS study suggest?▸
  • Bone transport has a lower fusion rate
  • Deep muscles and periosteum move with the transported segment but superficial muscle and fascia move very little
  • Major vessels lengthen and become tortuous distally, causing kinking
  • EPOS suggests acute shortening + LLD correction via proximal metaphyseal lengthening after corticotomy
Q10What is the pathology and the functional outcome at maturity?▸
  • Fibrous hamartoma in pathological periosteum -> strangulation of blood supply, decrease osteogenicity, increased osteoclastic resorption
  • Dysplastic bone -> failure of new bone formation and segmental weakening
  • Anterolateral bowing associated with NF (50%), ED syndrome, amnionic band syndrome
  • At maturity: FWB 40%, LLD 60%, walk unlimited 70%, no ankle 30%, sports <30%
Q11What radiographic patterns are described in the progression of congenital tibial dysplasia?▸
  • Dense cortex
  • Narrowed medullary canal (widened cortex)
  • Cystic lesion
  • Dysplastic segment
Q12Which classification do these features represent?▸
  • The Crawford classification of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia
  • Types I-IV: dense canal, widened cortex, cystic, then dysplastic pseudoarthrosis
Q13Describe the clinical and radiographic findings.▸
  • Left leg bowing with apex posterior
  • The ankle is not in a normal resting posture
  • X-ray: tibia and fibula bowing with apex posterior
  • Correlate clinically and obtain an AP film to see whether the bowing is posteromedial
Q14What is the diagnosis and its natural history?▸
  • Posteromedial bowing of the tibia
  • Physiological and commonly associated with intra-uterine malpositioning
  • Benign course, usually self-remodels
  • No syndromal correlation
Q15What history and examination findings would you look for?▸
  • Multiple pregnancy, oligohydramnios
  • Packaging syndrome: torticollis, DDH, metatarsal adductus
  • Check the ankle for calcaneovalgus feet
Q16What is the management and expected outcome?▸
  • Physiotherapy for stretching
  • Monitor for correction and LLD
  • Expect LLD of about 3-4cm