FRCS Revision

This site is private

Enter the password to open the revision library.

Personal revision library · not clinical advice
FRCSRevision
Home / Trauma / Clavicle and humeral shaft fractures
Trauma

Clavicle and humeral shaft fractures

Distal clavicle and shoulder girdle fractures, displaced humeral shaft fracture patterns.

82 questions 8 source pages 3 fact-check flags

Images appear with the first question taken from each source page — tap a question to open it.

82 questions
Q1Describe the X-ray features of this midshaft clavicle fracture.▸
  • Fracture midshaft clavicle with superior displacement of the proximal fragment
  • Shortening ~1cm
  • No fracture of ribs/humerus
Q2What are the deforming forces in a midshaft clavicle fracture?▸
  • SCM pulls the proximal part superior
  • Weight of the arm pulls the distal part inferior
  • Pectoralis major adducts the arm causing shortening
Q3What patient and fracture factors favour surgery in a midshaft clavicle fracture?▸
  • >2cm shortening, complete displacement
  • Smoking, comminution, old female
  • Increased PROM at 6 weeks (Mckee JBJS 2012)
Q4What are the absolute indications for surgery in a clavicle fracture?▸
  • Open injury
  • Vascular injury
  • Scapulothoracic dissociation/floating shoulder
  • Progressive neurological deficit
Q5What is the evidence for and against surgery in midshaft clavicle fractures?▸
  • For: 2012 McKee meta-analysis - earlier return of function; 2013 Robinson RCT - better functional score
  • Against: 2020 CORR Bandari meta-analysis - more nonunion with conservative care but no functional difference
  • Surgery increases likelihood of union (about 10 patients would need to undergo surgery to avoid one nonunion) but do not expect better function
  • Weigh against complications and possible second procedure for hardware removal
Q6Compare plate versus nail fixation for midshaft clavicle fracture.▸
  • Plate: faster recovery, superior biomechanics esp comminution; NV injury, hardware prominence/irritation
  • Nail: small wound, less soft tissue dissection, shorter op, less infection; rotationally unstable, implant migration, more nonunion
  • BJJ 2017 Fuglesang RCT: nail for no comminution, plate for comminuted
Q7What is the initial assessment and classification of this clavicle fracture?▸
  • ATLS if high energy; rule out other injury
  • Local: skin impingement wound, brachial plexus, SSSC, subclavian and lung injury
  • Classification: Allman type 1
Q8Describe the surgical details of clavicle fixation.▸
  • GA, beach chair position
  • Horizontal incision over the clavicle (superior or inferior)
  • Platysma split, protect the supraclavicular nerve, open the deltotrapezial fascia
Q9Compare superior versus anterior plating of the clavicle.▸
  • Superior: biomechanically higher load to failure and bending, better for inferior comminution; risk of injury to subclavian artery/vein
  • Anterior: quicker operation, less blood loss, plate significantly better tolerated
Q10What should a patient choosing nonoperative treatment be told?▸
  • Nonunion occurs in slightly more than 10% of patients
  • Nonunions can be more difficult to manage than acute fractures
Q11Describe the X-ray features of this distal clavicle fracture.▸
  • Fracture of distal 1/3 clavicle with displacement, no comminution, mild shortening
  • Acute fracture, no lytic lesion
  • No fracture over scapula, humerus or ribs; no pneumothorax; no gas in soft tissue
Q12What is the classification and nonunion risk?▸
  • Allman II, Neer II, displaced
  • Risk factor for nonunion - up to 60% in Neer IIA
Q13What are the nonunion risk factors for distal clavicle fracture?▸
  • Patient factors: age, smoking, female
  • Disease factors: Allman II, Neers II, comminution, shortening 2cm, displacement
Q14What did Robinson 2004 JBJS show?▸
  • Nonop treatment given good medium term result
  • Symptomatic nonunion that required late recon 14%
  • Asymptomatic nonunion does not affect functional outcome
  • Recommended 6 months as an acceptable cut off for nonoperative treatment, after which recon surgery may be required if patient has persistent sx
Q15What did the AJSM 2021 Uittenbogaard meta-analysis of 2282 patients show?▸
  • Hook plates had lower functional scores than CC fixation; no difference in union rates
  • Nonoperative patients showed good functional outcomes despite a 31% nonunion rate
  • With locking plate, additional CC fixation led to better function outcomes
Q16What are the complications of surgery for distal clavicle fracture?▸
  • General: infection (4%)
  • Hardware failure (1%)
  • Bone: nonunion (2%)
  • Soft tissue: NV injury (2%), frozen shoulder (4%)
Q17What history and examination points are important in a distal clavicle fracture?▸
  • Hx: mechanism of injury, associated injury
  • P/E: breathing, haemodynamic status, C spine, ipsilateral limb
Q18What are the absolute indications for surgery in a distal clavicle fracture?▸
  • Neurovascular compromise
  • Open fracture
  • Floating shoulder
Q19What is the nonunion rate in Neer type II fractures and is it clinically significant?▸
  • Nonunion rate is very high - about 1/3 to 2/3
  • Incidence of symptomatic nonunion is very low (Neer, Nordqvist about 1/3)
Q20What are the weaknesses of the evidence supporting nonoperative management?▸
  • Relatively small sample sizes (type II error)
  • Fixation was mainly by hook plate, which always needs a second operation for implant removal
Q21What fixation is preferred for a young active patient with a distal clavicle fracture?▸
  • Suture button construct - no need for removal of implant
  • Healing rate is quite reliable
Q22What methods of fixation are available for distal clavicle fracture?▸
  • Superior vs anterior plate
  • Hook plate
  • CC screw
  • Suture
Q23Describe the X-ray features of this scapular neck fracture.▸
  • Displaced fracture of the glenoid neck with medial displacement and possible angulation
  • Fracture extends to the medial scapular and supraspinatus fossa; articular surface not involved
  • No fracture clavicle/acromion/proximal humerus; coracoid difficult to assess; no rib fracture or pneumothorax
Q24What classifications apply to scapular fractures?▸
  • Ideberg - glenoid fracture morphology and exit site
  • Goss - scapular neck: A anatomical, B surgical, C inferior to scapula spine
  • Ogawa - coracoid; Kuhn - acromion; clavicle by Allman/Neer
  • Scapula = AO 14F
Q25What are the indications for surgery in scapular fractures?▸
  • Displaced intra-articular fracture >25% articular surface, step 5mm
  • Scapular neck with >45 degree angulation or 2cm medial translation
  • Glenopolar angle <20 (rotational malalignment of glenoid)
  • Acromion fracture with subacromial impingement; coracoid fracture causing AC joint separation
  • Relative: floating shoulder - scapular neck fracture with displaced clavicle/ACJ disruption
Q26What is Comoli sign?▸
  • Swelling outlining the scapula
  • Suggests compartment syndrome of the infraspinatus
Q27What is the SSSC and how does it affect management?▸
  • Superior shoulder suspensory complex - bone/soft tissue ring at the end of superior and inferior struts
  • Superior strut: acromion and clavicle; inferior strut: scapular spine and glenoid; connected by CA, CC, AC ligaments
  • Disruption of 2 structures theoretically compromises stability = floating shoulder (>1cm displacement, >45 degrees angulation)
  • Edwards JBJS 2000 (20 patients): nonoperative strength comparable to normal - no absolute indication for surgery
Q28Describe the posterior approach to the shoulder.▸
  • Modified Judet - do not detach deltoid from spine; Classic Judet - detach deltoid from spine; Brodsky - incision parallel to lateral border
  • Lateral decubitus, GA, ipsilateral arm draped free; landmarks scapular spine and acromion
  • Incision along scapular spine then medial border (reverse 7 on right, 7 on left)
  • Internervous plane infraspinatus and teres minor (SSN and AN); at risk: suprascapular nerve superior, axillary nerve + posterior circumflex artery inferior to TM
Q29What is the initial management and imaging workup of a scapular neck fracture?▸
  • ATLS; rule out neck injury
  • Rule out compartment syndrome (Comoli sign)
  • CXR to look for scapulothoracic dissociation
  • Axillary/Velpeau view for dislocation; CT for glenoid articular surface, glenoid position (translation, GPA) and scapular body angulation
Q30What is the glenopolar angle?▸
  • Angle between a line across the superior and inferior glenoid and a line between the superior glenoid and inferior scapular angle
  • <20 degrees is an indication for surgery (rotational malalignment of the glenoid)
Q31What long-term complications occur if SSSC disruption is treated conservatively?▸
  • Nonunion, malunion
  • Impingement and altered shoulder mechanics
  • Osteoarthritis
Q32Describe the X-ray features of this comminuted proximal humeral fracture.▸
  • Comminuted fracture of the right proximal humerus with GT, head and neck fragments
  • Fracture over the anatomical head with short metaphyseal extension <8mm
  • Displaced with medial hinge disruption >=2mm
  • No fracture scapula/ribs, no pneumothorax, no underlying lytic lesion
Q33What are Hertel criteria and their significance?▸
  • Hertel 2004 predicts AVN of the humeral head
  • 97% chance of AVN if all three criteria met
  • Minor criteria: head split, 3-4 part, dislocation
  • Poor predictors of ischaemia: dislocation, tuberosity displacement, angular displacement of the head, 3-4 part fracture
Q34What did the ProFHer trial show?▸
  • JAMA 2015 - no significant benefit of surgery at 2-year FU
  • Critiques: selection bias (clear indications for surgery excluded), low cases per surgeon
  • Fracture patterns categorised by Neer classification rather than pathomorphology
Q35What is the evidence for fixation versus replacement?▸
  • Gupta 2015 JOT: higher reoperation in ORIF vs HA/RSA but significantly better outcomes in ORIF
  • DelPhi trial JBJS 2020: for B2, C2 fractures in the elderly, RSA gives better functional outcomes
Q36What is the evidence for implant choice?▸
  • Fixation: nail or plate - Metanalysis 2018 Int Ortho Sun et al: no difference
  • Arthroplasty: Cuff et al JBJS 2013 - RSA better clinical outcomes than hemi, similar complication rate
Q37Describe the deltopectoral approach and fixation.▸
  • Skin incision from coracoid along deltopectoral groove; retract cephalic vein laterally
  • Plane between deltoid and pec major; stay lateral to the conjoint tendon; clavipectoral fascia
  • Tag tuberosities; enter through fracture site; head to shaft fixation with K wire +/- bone graft
  • Aim CCD angle >120, retroversion 20; tuberosities tied together restore metaphyseal torus
  • 3.5mm locking plate in neutralization mode 5mm distal to GT tip, 2mm lateral to bicipital groove; 5 screws proximally, 3 distally
  • Pin and make sure position good for calcar screw to prevent varus collapse
Q38What history and examination are required in a proximal humeral fracture?▸
  • Assess for associated injuries: C spine, scapula, clavicle, ribs
  • NV condition esp brachial plexus, axillary nerve, axillary artery
Q39What is the acute management of a proximal humeral fracture?▸
  • Analgesics
  • Immobilisation with a shoulder immobiliser
  • Long-term management should address osteoporosis
Q40What patient and fracture factors determine whether to operate?▸
  • Patient: age, comorbidities, associated injuries, premorbid function
  • Fracture: displacement, comminution, bone quality
Q41Describe the rehabilitation phases after proximal humerus fixation.▸
  • Phase 1 (first 3 weeks): pendular exercises, gentle assisted motion; avoid ER for the first 6 weeks
  • Phase 2 (3-9 weeks): active assisted forward flexion and abduction; no abduction against resistance weeks 3-6; reduce assistance from week 6
  • Phase 3 (after week 9): isotonic concentric and eccentric strengthening; add passive stretching if stiff
Q42Describe this X-ray and classify the proximal humeral fracture using Neer's classification.▸
  • Fracture of the GT and surgical neck of the humerus with angular displacement
  • Likely a 3-part fracture by Neer classification
  • Short medial metaphyseal extension (<8mm) with disrupted medial hinge - 97% chance of AVN (Hertel 2004)
Q43What is the blood supply to the humeral head?▸
  • Traditional belief: mainly the arcuate branch of the ascending anterior circumflex
  • Mainly from the posterior circumflex according to Henrich 2010 JBJS (64%)
Q44What is Neer's classification threshold for a displaced part?▸
  • 1cm displacement defines a displaced part
  • 45 degree angulation also defines a displaced part
Q45How do age and AVN risk guide management?▸
  • Old patient, low functional demand and fit for surgery - advise hemiarthroplasty/RSA (Delphi trial)
  • Young patient - still attempt ORIF with plating (long-term hemiarthroplasty outcome uncertain; Gupta JOT 2015)
Q46What are the principles and key parameters of hemiarthroplasty?▸
  • Needs an intact CA arch
  • Aim: restore biomechanics of the shoulder and allow early mobilisation; principles include anatomical and stable fixation of hemiarthroplasty, correct tensioning and position of implant, secure reattachment of tuberosities
  • Deltopectoral approach; identify GT/LT by position of biceps tendon and tag fragments
  • Retroversion ~30 degrees; top of implant to GT 7-8mm; top of humeral head to upper border of pec major insertion = 5.6cm; should translate <50% of head
Q47What are the complications of hemiarthroplasty?▸
  • Approach related: axillary nerve injury, subscapularis rupture, traction injury to musculocutaneous nerve
  • Implant related: poor tensioning/positioning, cuff retraction with weakness, infection, loosening, glenoid erosion, anterosuperior escape
Q48What history, examination and imaging are needed in a proximal humeral fracture?▸
  • Hx: age, function, injury mechanism; rule out associated fracture (distal radius, clavicle, chest, neck)
  • PE: wound, axillary nerve function
  • Obtain Y view or Velpeau axillary view to rule out dislocation
Q49Describe the technical steps of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture.▸
  • Deltopectoral approach; identify GT/LT by the position of the biceps tendon and tag the fragments
  • Dislocate/retrieve the humeral head, prepare the canal by reaming, trial then cement the implant
  • Retroversion ~30 degrees - lateral fin slightly posterior to the bicipital groove
  • Height: sit on medial calcar if present, top of implant to GT 7-8mm, head top to upper border of pec major insertion 5.6cm, translate <50% of head
  • Head size templated from the contralateral shoulder; reattach GT/LT/SS under the collar by suture
Q50Describe the X-ray on the left.▸
  • Spiral fracture of the left midshaft humerus
  • Mild angulation on attempted AP view
Q51What is acceptable alignment and conservative management for a humeral shaft fracture?▸
  • Acceptable: 30 degree angulation on AP, 20 degree on lateral, 3cm shortening
  • Coaptation splint first for 2 weeks until swelling improves, then Sarmiento brace
  • Tighten brace twice weekly; do not lean on the elbow
  • Low threshold to ORIF as distal third fractures are prone to slip into varus
Q52Describe the X-ray on the right and why you would operate.▸
  • Short oblique midshaft fracture with minimal comminution, no shortening
  • Less contact area - higher strain per unit length, high chance of nonunion if treated conservatively
  • Hanging cast is contraindicated due to over-distraction
  • ORIF via anterior approach; lag screw + neutralisation plate/DCP (broad 4.5mm, staggered holes, 7 cortices)
  • Anterior approach: lateral to bicep, bicep to medial, split brachialis at lateral 1/3 b/w plane of radial nerve and MCN, risk if lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm, radial nerve at lateral border of brachialis
Q53What are the advantages and disadvantages of nailing a humeral shaft fracture?▸
  • Advantages: biologically friendly (does not disrupt fracture haematoma); mechanically more rigid, smaller bending strains, less fatigue failure
  • Disadvantages: Limited by canal diameter and preexisting shoulder stiffness (7mm); iatrogenic comminution during reaming; cuff damage; radial nerve entrapment; axillary/radial nerve injury with locking screws
  • Violates Perren's strain theory if no interfragmentary compression
  • Heineman 2012: similar union/infection/reoperation but higher total complications with nail; Ouyang 2013 J SES 2013 metaanalysis: similar outcomes, plating less occurrence of shoulder problem
Q54What are the indications for surgery in a humeral shaft fracture?▸
  • Open fracture, compartment syndrome
  • Floating elbow, vascular injury requiring repair
  • Relative: 2nd radial nerve palsy after CR, Holstein-Lewis fracture, >20 degree angulation in 2 planes or >3cm shortening, unable to maintain acceptable closed reduction
Q55How do you manage a radial nerve palsy with a humeral shaft fracture?▸
  • Overall prevalence 12%; observe if alignment good, no open fracture, no vascular/soft tissue compromise, not iatrogenic
  • Shao JBJS (Br) 2005 systemic review: spontaneous recovery 70%; no difference early exploration vs expectant management
  • Ilyas JAAOS 2020 favours early exploration: expectant 77.2%, late >8 weeks 68.1%, surgical mx within 3 weeks 89.8%, 10.5% incarceration rate, 26.8% laceration rate
  • Consider exploration + fracture fixation if no improvement after 3 weeks; monitor clinically (BR, ECRL/B, EDC/EPL, last EI) and with NCV
Q56Describe the technique of antegrade humeral nailing.▸
  • Anterolateral approach to the deltoid, enter through the rotator interval
  • Split the rotator cuff and insert the nail at the greater tuberosity
  • Proximal screws inserted laterally to avoid the axillary nerve
  • Distal screws inserted anteroposteriorly to avoid the musculocutaneous nerve
Q57What is a Sarmiento brace and how does it work?▸
  • Functional orthosis giving stability while allowing movement of the joint above and below
  • Uses the non-compressible nature of fluid and soft tissue
  • Circumferential pressure generates hydraulic pressure that stabilises the bone
  • Active muscle pull helps realign the fracture, promote secondary healing and provide blood supply
Q58What are the contraindications to a Sarmiento brace?▸
  • Shortening, length-unstable fracture, bone loss
  • Open fracture/poor tissue envelope, fracture of other bones in the same limb
  • Uncooperative patient, fracture too proximal or distal
  • JBJS 2000: >80% union with good alignment; radial nerve palsy is not a contraindication
Q59How is a hanging cast used for humeral shaft fractures?▸
  • Realigns the fracture using the weight of the arm
  • Long arm cast with holes at the wrist (dorsal to volar, radial side), hung on the neck by C&C
  • Longer C&C extends, shorter C&C flexes
  • More dorsal holes = apex medial; more volar holes = apex lateral
Q60What are the deforming forces in a proximal humeral shaft fracture?▸
  • Depends on the fracture position relative to the deltoid insertion
  • Proximal to deltoid: proximal fragment adducted by pectoralis major
  • Distal to deltoid: proximal fragment abducted by deltoid
Q61How is radial nerve recovery monitored?▸
  • Clinical: BR, ECRL/B, EDC/EPL, last EI
  • NCV immediately after injury for documentation (absent signal may be pre-existing)
  • Repeat at 2 weeks: conduction present = neuropraxia; absent = axonotmesis/neurotmesis
  • Repeat at 2 months to differentiate axonotmesis from neurotmesis
Q62How is secondary/iatrogenic radial nerve palsy after surgery managed?▸
  • Entrapment 6-25%; laceration 20-42%
  • Literature generally supports non-surgical management; no single algorithm
  • No exploration: spontaneous recovery 70%, but 90% do not reach complete recovery
  • Early exploration allows repair or early grafting; late exploration lets the neurilemmal sheath thicken
  • Some studies show that function recovery is more complete and consistent with this approach - for me, I would choose early exploration, as the risk of bad result from postponement justifies early exploration in case of uncertain nerve damage
Q63Describe the X-ray features of this distal third humeral shaft fracture.▸
  • Spiral fracture of the distal 1/3 humerus with butterfly fragment
  • Fracture angulated into varus
Q64Why is the radial nerve prone to injury in distal third humeral fractures?▸
  • Tethered by the lateral intermuscular septum as it passes from posterior to anterior at the 1/3 of the humerus (15cm from lateral epicondyle)
  • At risk of traction injury (22%)
Q65Is radial nerve palsy an indication for surgery?▸
  • Traditionally believed to be an absolute indication
  • Found to have spontaneous recovery in 90% of cases (Elkholm JOT 2008), most due to neuropraxia
Q66Why operate on this fracture?▸
  • Alignment may put the nerve under more tension, affecting its capacity for good healing and recovery
  • Difficult to immobilise the fracture without immobilising the elbow - causes elbow stiffness
  • Posterior approach - split triceps or paratricipital
  • 3.5mm extraarticular plate if very distal, or 4.5 narrow LCP
Q67What is a Holstein-Lewis fracture?▸
  • Distal third humeral shaft fracture associated with radial nerve palsy in 20%
  • CR is contraindicated as it may tear the radial nerve
  • If alignment unsatisfactory - plating via anterolateral approach, go through brachioradialis and brachalis, the plane in which the radial nerve lies when it goes anterior - can explore radial nerve
  • Posterior approach: radial nerve lies between medial and lateral head of triceps then to the lateral intermuscular septum
Q68What are the conservative options for a distal third humeral shaft fracture?▸
  • Brace or cast
  • Must immobilise the elbow as well
Q69What are the absolute indications for surgery in a humerus fracture?▸
  • Open fracture
  • Vascular compromise
  • Compartment syndrome
  • Unacceptable alignment
Q70Describe the X-ray features of this intercondylar distal humeral fracture.▸
  • Comminuted intercondylar fracture of the right humerus with varus angulation and metaphyseal comminution
  • AO type C fracture
Q71What is the assessment and pre-op workup?▸
  • Age, function, hand dominance, mechanism; high energy - ATLS and rule out injury in the same limb
  • Locally: skin wound/impingement, soft tissue condition, compartment, nerve palsy (radial nerve most at risk)
  • Rest in a long arm slab and get CT before OT to assess the comminution
Q72What are the principles of surgery?▸
  • Anatomical reduction of the articular surface
  • Restore the tiearch of the distal humerus
  • Stable fixation with double plating to allow early mobilisation
Q73What is the Jupiter classification?▸
  • Low T, High T
  • H, Y, medial/lateral lambda
Q74Describe the olecranon osteotomy.▸
  • Lateral decubitus, GA, Xray guidance; longitudinal incision at mid posterior curve to radial at olecranon process
  • Elevate full thickness fasciocutanoeous flaps; identify and protect the ulnar nerve, release through cubital tunnel to first motor branch to FCU
  • Proximally based V-shaped chevron osteotomy ~2cm distal to tip of olecranon, aiming at the bare area of the sigmoid notch
  • Predrill holes; pass gauze inside the joint to protect cartilage; drill hole at the apex to prevent propagation; saw with irrigation and finish with osteotome
  • JSES 2017: extraarticular step cut may be more stable with higher bone contact surface area
Q75What are O'Driscoll's principles of distal humeral fixation?▸
  • Respect O'Driscoll's principles: insert screws in an interdigitated manner, purchasing as many articular fragments as possible
  • As many screws distally as possible; each screw should engage the other side; screw as long as possible
  • Every distal screw should pass through the plate; plates apply compression at the supracondylar level
  • Do not end plates at the same level, to avoid stress rise
  • 90/90 plating: similar biomechanics to parallel plating but better resistance to torsional loading
Q76Describe the paratricipital approach to the distal humerus.▸
  • Midline posterior incision
  • Identify the ulnar nerve and dissect 15cm proximal to the elbow and distally to the first branch to FCU
  • Medially elevate triceps by freeing the medial intermuscular septum; distally elevate the posterior band of MCL
  • Laterally identify the radial nerve if a long plate is planned; divide the anconeus distally for exposure
Q77Which posterior approaches are available for the distal humerus?▸
  • Olecranon osteotomy
  • Paratricipital approach
  • Triceps reflecting (TRAP) approach
Q78What are the advantages of parallel plating?▸
  • Can insert longer screws from the lateral side
  • Orthogonal plating gives better torsional rigidity
  • Better for coronal shear fragments
  • Requires less stripping, preserving blood supply of the lateral condyle (SK Lee Eur J O&T 2013)
Q79Should the ulnar nerve be transposed during distal humerus ORIF?▸
  • Not routinely - transposition does not decrease ulnar nerve palsy rate
  • Some studies record 4 times higher ulnar nerve dysfunction after transposition
  • Decide based on impingement/subluxation when screening the full range after fixation
  • Ilyas Hand Clinic 2018: overall incidence 19.3%; transposition 23.5%
Q80What is the rate of heterotopic ossification and is prophylaxis indicated?▸
  • HO reported rate 8%
  • Routine prophylaxis is not warranted
  • Indomethacin increased the rate of nonunion
Q81When is total elbow arthroplasty considered for distal humerus fracture and what are its problems?▸
  • For elderly patients with osteoporotic bone and comminution not amenable to stable fixation
  • Dehghan 2019 JSES: Type C2/C3, female >65 years - TEA is an option
  • Bryan Morrey approach: release triceps tendon and periosteum medial to lateral and elevate as a single unit off the olecranon, reflecting laterally
  • Problems: columns and collaterals are not intact - need linked implants with bearing wear/loosening; periprosthetic fracture
Q82Describe the ORIF sequence for a distal humerus fracture.▸
  • Reduce articular fragments and fix large pieces with lag screws, or positional screws if comminuted
  • Fix the articular fragment to the metaphyseal region
  • Choose 90/90 plating (posterolateral and medial)
  • Do not end the plates at the same level to avoid stress rise

Fact check

Bandari 2020 CORR meta-analysis: more nonunion with conservative (union rate 97% vs 89%) — union-rate figures appear assigned to the wrong groups — Contemporary meta-analyses show operative treatment has the higher union rate; the 97% vs 89% figures should read operative vs conservative respectively — (medium confidence) — source
Hook plates have lower functional scores and revision rates compared with CC fixation — revision-rate direction likely reversed — Uittenbogaard 2021 found hook plates had lower functional scores, no union-rate difference, but higher revision/complication rates (implant removal) than CC fixation — (medium confidence) — source
Humeral head blood supply mainly from the posterior circumflex according to the study of Henrich 2010 JBJS (64%) — citation author name is incorrect — The study is Hettrich et al., JBJS 2010;92(4):943-8, which found the posterior humeral circumflex artery supplied 64% of the humeral head — source