FRCS Revision

This site is private

Enter the password to open the revision library.

Personal revision library · not clinical advice
FRCSRevision
Home / Trauma / Knee and tibial shaft fractures
Trauma

Knee and tibial shaft fractures

Floating knee and Fraser classification, Hoffa fragment, tibial plateau and tibial shaft fractures.

43 questions 7 source pages 3 images 1 fact-check flags

Images appear with the first question taken from each source page — tap a question to open it.

43 questions
Q1What is the Fraser classification for floating knee and what are the surgical considerations?▸
  • Type 1 extraarticular
  • Femur first; if it becomes unstable can slab the tibia (better than traction on the femur)
  • Can immobilise tibia during femoral fixation but not vice versa (need knee flexion for tibial fixation)
  • Type 1 can consider retrograde nail, same wound for both fractures
Q2What is the management if there is a vascular injury?▸
  • Reduce the fracture, reassess
  • CTA +/- exploration
Q3What is a Hoffa fragment and how is it detected?▸
  • Coronal fracture of the femoral condyle
  • Easily missed - request lateral X-ray/CT in any distal femur fracture
Q4What are the considerations in managing a Hoffa fragment?▸
  • Fragment may not be well fixed with a lateral locking plate; needs anatomical reduction and lag screw in AP manner before plating
  • Use countersink or headless screw
  • Isolated fragment may need posteromedial/posterolateral incision
Q5Describe the tibial plateau fracture pattern and metaphyseal extension on X-ray.▸
  • Tibial plateau fracture involving both medial and lateral condyles, articular stepping, metaphyseal involvement, metaphyseal-diaphyseal dissociation
  • +/- fibular fracture, joint subluxation
  • Schatzker type VI
Q6What is the acute assessment and soft tissue management?▸
  • ATLS, primary survey, AMPLE history; full circumferential soft tissue examination, compartments
  • NV status: popliteal artery tethered at adductor hiatus and soleus arch; common peroneal nerve
  • Soft tissue compromise: Span Scan Plan
  • CT to assess the three columns and plan approach
Q7What are the aims of definitive fixation?▸
  • Anatomical reduction of the articular surface; primary bone healing with absolute rigidity
  • Correct coronal and sagittal alignment
  • Buttress plating for the metaphysis
Q8Describe the approaches.▸
  • Anterolateral (TA/bone) and posteromedial (medial hamstring/medial gastrocnemius; risk saphaneus nerve (saphenous), MCL)
  • Assess articular reduction through submeniscal arthrotomy/scope for meniscus and cruciate status
Q9How is reduction and fixation performed?▸
  • Split: periarticular clamp/femoral distractor; depression: bone punch from the split
  • Fill void with bone graft (autograft, allograft, synthetic bone graft, injectable bone cement)
  • Support articular fragment with 3.5mm raft screw, followed by an angular stable device such as a 4.5mm periarticular locking plate in buttressing mode
  • Assess overall alignment with the cable method; too comminuted then ring/hybrid external fixator
Q10What is the prognosis?▸
  • Key to good outcome: restoration of joint line and mechanical axis (mechanical axis > articular surface)
  • ~7% had TKR 10 years after index operation (Wasserstein JBJS 2014)
  • OA incidence up to 30% if axis deviation more than 5 degrees, increasing TKA likelihood 5 times
  • Complications ~10%; 1-year mortality 14%
Q11What is the incidence of compartment syndrome in tibial plateau fractures?▸
  • 0.7-12%
Q12What is the evidence comparing ORIF with circular external fixation?▸
  • Canadian OTS multicentre RCT 2006: functional results similar
  • ORIF group had more deep infections and unplanned returns to theatre
Q13Describe the anterolateral approach to the tibial plateau.▸
  • Longitudinal incision lateral to patella starting 2cm below Gerdy tubercle
  • Incise deep fascia anterior to ITB
  • Subperiosteal dissection of the proximal attachment of tibialis anterior
  • Submeniscal arthrotomy; +/- lateral epicondyle osteotomy (extended AL approach)
Q14Describe the lateral approach to the tibial plateau.▸
  • Skin incision from lateral epicondyle to posterior fibular head
  • Protect the CPN
  • Interval: ITB and biceps femoris; enter the joint posteriorly between LCL and gastroc LH (gastrocnemius lateral head), or anterior to the LCL
  • +/- fibular osteotomy (Lobenhoffer) for better exposure
Q15Describe the posteromedial approach to the tibial plateau.▸
  • Skin incision from medial epicondyle to posterior edge of tibia
  • Release pes anserinus, retract it anteriorly; medial head of gastrocnemius posteriorly
  • May release part of the popliteus for exposure; submeniscal arthrotomy
Q16What are the criteria for non-operative management?▸
  • <2mm articular step
  • Stable in knee extension
  • No varus/valgus malalignment
Q17What is the rehabilitation after tibial plateau fixation?▸
  • Protected weight bearing
  • Controlled ROM exercises
  • Regime tailor made to fixation type, comminution at surgery and associated injuries
Q18What is the evidence for primary arthroplasty in elderly patients?▸
  • For elderly patients with tibial plateau fracture and pre-existing knee OA
  • EFFORT group 2016; also Injury 2021 Sabaitini
Q19What is the initial assessment and acute management of a tibial plateau fracture?▸
  • High energy mechanism: follow ATLS and rule out hip and ankle pathology
  • R/O open fracture, compartment Sx and NV injury
  • Think possible knee dislocation
  • Ext fix +/- compartmental release
  • CT to delineate fracture pattern and comminution
  • Expect 1-2/52 for soft tissue to settle
Q20What is the aim of operation for a tibial plateau fracture?▸
  • Restore articular surface
  • Stable fixation
Q21What approaches and fixation are used for a tibial plateau fracture?▸
  • AL (anterolateral) and medial approach
  • Buttress plate + raft screw +/- bone graft
  • +/- submeniscal dissection x articular reduction
  • EUA x ligamentous injury
Q22What is the post-operative regimen after tibial plateau fracture fixation?▸
  • Post-op ROM 0-90
  • NWB
Q23Describe the tibial shaft fracture and associated fibular injury on X-ray.📷▸
AP lat XR left tibia and fibula including knee and part of ankle joint
AP lat XR left tibia and fibula including knee and part of ankle joint
  • Fracture of the proximal 1/3 of the tibial shaft with valgus and apex anterior displacement
  • Fibula neck fracture
  • AO B2
Q24What is the initial assessment and management?▸
  • ATLS, primary survey, AMPLE history
  • Local: soft tissue, skin impingement, NV status (CPN), compartment syndrome; systemic secondary survey
  • XR one joint above and below
  • Long leg slab + analgesics; close monitoring for compartment syndrome
Q25What are the principles of definitive management and why use an antegrade IM nail?▸
  • Restore tibial length, correct angulation and rotation; achieve secondary bone healing; prevent complications
  • Load sharing device that is biomechanically more rigid than a plate
  • Preserves biology (not disrupting fracture haematoma); minimally invasive; Have the option of secondary dynamization if delay union
Q26What is the classic deformity and how is it corrected?▸
  • Proximal: procurvatum (patellar tendon) + valgus (by ATT - anterior tibial tendon)
  • Distal: varus + IR (PTT, FHL, FDL)
  • Reduction: traction, manipulation, reduction forceps, unicortical Shanz pins
  • Poller screw on concave side in proximal fragment (lateral, posterior), convex side distally; +/- anterior unicortical plate
Q27Describe the entry point and nailing steps.▸
  • Lateral to midline, medial to lateral tibial spine (more lateral prevents valgus); just anterior to articular surface, as proximal/posterior as possible without breaking it
  • Knee in slightly extended position; awl, guidewire to centre of tibial plafond at physeal scar; serial reaming; measure length; static locked nail
  • Choose a reamed nail: bone graft, bigger nail more rigid, better endosteal fit, reduced working length
  • SPRINT trial: reaming decreased future bone grafting and nail exchange
Q28What are the non-operative regime and alignment targets?▸
  • Long leg cast 4 wk then patellar bearing brace/ Sarmiento brace for 12 week; union rate 90%
  • Varus/valgus <5 degrees, AP angulation <10 degrees, rotation 10 degrees, shortening <1cm, joint line parallel
Q29What is the post-operative rehabilitation?▸
  • FWB (full weight bearing)
Q30Describe the injury.📷▸
Gustilo I fracture tibial shaft with proximal fragment protruding out of skin in
Gustilo I fracture tibial shaft with proximal fragment protruding out of skin in
  • Gustilo I fracture of the tibial shaft with the proximal fragment protruding out of skin in an inside-out manner
  • Leg pink
Q31What is the acute management of an open fracture per BOA guidelines?▸
  • Antibiotic within 1 hour (1st gen cephalosporin + aminoglycoside) + anti-tetanus
  • Remove gross contamination, take a picture, dressing with NS gauze + impermeable film
  • Direct pressure for bleeding control; temporary reduction + slab
  • Next step is XR
Q32What is the timing of early total care?▸
  • Within 12 hours for solitary high energy open fractures
  • Within 24 hours for all other low energy open fractures
  • If there is no vascular compromise
Q33Describe the procedure.▸
  • GA, supine with triangular support; irrigation with 3L NS under low pressure; remove non-viable bone/soft tissue; assess wound coverage after debridement
  • If soft tissue acceptable, go for definitive nailing via a split patellar approach
  • Entry site: coronal plane parallel to the canal; sagittal plane just distal to the angle between tibial plateau and anterior tibial metaphysis
  • 2 static locking screws proximal and distal; continue antibiotics until wound ok; Closely monitor for compartment syndrome; WBAT
Q34What is the evidence for nailing in open fractures?▸
  • Unreamed IMN interlocking showed superior results for Gustilo II/IIIA/B: 1less malunion, 2lower infection rate, 3↓no. of OT needed (Bhandari 2001 JBJS Br)
  • Foote from canada published in CORR 2015 network meta-analysis: definitive IM nail once soft tissue settled may be superior independent of Gustilo grade; Use of unreamed nails over reamed nails also may be advantageous in the setting of open fractures. LESS REOPERATION
  • In multitrauma open fracture, no evidence for reaming (SPRINT trial)
Q35How do you avoid compartment syndrome and when should soft tissue coverage be performed?▸
  • High index of suspicion; avoid regional anaesthetic blocks
  • Definitive soft tissue coverage within 5 days
Q36Would you ream in this isolated open tibial fracture and why?▸
  • Isolated trauma with risk of nonunion - ream to allow a larger nail
  • Biological advantage of bone graft deposition
  • In multitrauma open fracture there is no evidence for reaming (SPRINT trial)
Q37What are the advantages of plating a distal 1/3 extraarticular tibia fracture?📷▸
Distal 1/3 extraarticular tibia fracture
Distal 1/3 extraarticular tibia fracture
  • Anatomical reduction
  • Primary bone healing
Q38What are the disadvantages of plating a distal 1/3 tibia fracture?▸
  • More dissection, especially at the site of anastomosis between PTA and ATA
  • Load bearing construct
  • Implant impingement
Q39What are the mechanical and biological advantages of IM nailing?▸
  • Mechanical: load sharing implant, more torsional and bending rigidity
  • Biology: does not disturb the fracture hematoma; reaming deposits bone graft
  • Cons: more anterior knee pain
Q40Which implant is load bearing and which is load sharing?▸
  • Plate = load bearing construct
  • IM nail = load sharing implant
  • Nail has more torsional and bending rigidity
Q41What did the FixDT trial (Costa 2018) show?▸
  • IM nail: greater recovery - less disability, better ankle function and health-related QoL at 3 months
  • Cost lower with IM nail
  • Longer term: similar disability ratings and infection
Q42What did the Injury 2021 Bleeker meta-analysis show?▸
  • Nail - more malunion
  • Plate - more infection
  • Management should be individualized
Q43Should the fibula be plated if the tibia is nailed?▸
  • Frodl EFFORT 2021 metaanalysis: no difference in nonunion
  • Fixing fibula may reduce secondary valgus/varus malunion but higher risk of wound infection
  • Individualized decision

Fact check

Definitive soft tissue coverage should be within 5 days — outdated — BOA/BAPRAS (BOAST 4) standard is definitive closure or coverage within 72 hours of injury if it cannot be performed at the time of debridement — source