FRCS Revision

This site is private

Enter the password to open the revision library.

Personal revision library · not clinical advice
FRCSRevision
Home / Hand Bone / Scaphoid fracture and nonunion
Hand Bone

Scaphoid fracture and nonunion

Scaphoid waist fracture diagnosis, screw fixation, nonunion and advanced collapse.

36 questions 4 source pages 2 images 1 fact-check flags

Images appear with the first question taken from each source page — tap a question to open it.

36 questions
Q1Describe the X-ray findings of this scaphoid waist fracture.📷▸
PA and scaphoid XR showing patients wrist with scaphoid waist fracture
PA and scaphoid XR showing patients wrist with scaphoid waist fracture
  • Complete, displaced >1mm, horizontal oblique scaphoid waist fracture
  • Unstable according to the Herbert classification (Herbert B)
  • Acute - no cyst, sclerosis or arthritis
  • Associated SL widening; no carpal collapse or other fracture
Q2Why are scaphoid fractures prone to nonunion?▸
  • Biological: retrograde blood supply, no tendon attachment, 80% covered with cartilage, lacks osteogenic cambium layer, bathed in synovial fluid, small bone contact
  • Mechanical: connects the two carpal rows, area of high stress; proximal fragment extended/radially deviated by SL and DIC, distal fragment flexed/ulnar deviated around the RSC
  • Delayed presentation: 25% not seen on initial X-ray
Q3Describe the Herbert classification of scaphoid fractures.▸
  • A: stable - tubercle, horizontal waist, treated conservatively
  • B: unstable
  • C: delayed (6 weeks)
  • D: nonunion
  • Russe adds orientation: horizontal oblique, transverse, vertical oblique
Q4What is the blood supply of the scaphoid?▸
  • All supply is retrograde
  • Proximal 80% via the dorsal carpal artery
  • Distal 20% via the superficial palmar branch
  • No anastomosis between them
Q5What is the conservative management and union rate for a scaphoid waist fracture?▸
  • Short arm cast with thumb left free, wrist slightly extended, functional cup position
  • Cast for 8 weeks, union rate 90-95%
  • Scaphoid cast management is reliable in undisplaced stable waist fracture with union rate up to 90%
  • Duration by site: 8/10/12 weeks and union 90, 80, 60% for distal/waist/proximal fractures
  • No consensus on long versus short arm cast or thumb immobilisation
  • Netherlands meta-analysis (J Trauma 2011, 500 patients): no difference in union, pain, grip, time to union or osteonecrosis
Q6What is the evidence for cast versus surgery in scaphoid waist fractures?▸
  • SWIFT trial (Dias, Lancet 2020): fractures displaced 2mm or less should be treated with cast immobilisation, with early fixation of confirmed nonunion
  • Surgery gives similar long-term outcomes but more complications
  • McQueen (JBJS 2008): surgery shortens time to union (9 vs 14 weeks) and earlier return to work, but no difference in union rate, ROM or grip at 2 years
Q7What is the summary diagnosis and which further views are requested?▸
  • Herbert B scaphoid waist fracture, suspicious of SL widening
  • Better lateral view for displacement and humpback deformity
  • Stress view for SL dissociation
Q8What history is taken in a scaphoid fracture?▸
  • Age, hand dominance, occupation, functional demand
  • Mechanism of injury, delayed presentation, symptoms
Q9What examination findings are sought in scaphoid fracture?▸
  • Localised tenderness over the anatomical snuffbox and SL interval
  • Rule out other injuries
Q10What is the acute first aid for a scaphoid fracture?▸
  • Analgesics, rest, elevate
  • Short arm thumb spica slab
Q11Which patient and fracture factors guide definitive scaphoid management?▸
  • Timing, orientation, associated injuries
  • Displacement, site
  • Patient counselling
Q12What is the aim and technique of surgical fixation of a scaphoid waist fracture?▸
  • Reduce with stable fixation and compression; union rate up to 97%
  • Percutaneous approach with K wire as a joystick for reduction
  • Headless compression screw with differential pitch targeting the central longitudinal axis
Q13How is a grossly displaced scaphoid fracture approached?▸
  • Volar approach for ORIF - direct visualisation of the whole scaphoid, correct humpback deformity, preserve dorsal blood supply
  • Dorsal approach if the fracture is proximal
Q14Describe the percutaneous approaches to the scaphoid.▸
  • Volar: incision distal to STTJ, entry at scaphoid tubercle abutting STT; 12G hypodermic needle as guide; reduce by hyperextension and ulnar deviation; bean view - axis from middle third of scaphoid tubercle to distal half of proximal pole
  • Dorsal: pronate and flex until the scaphoid is seen as a double ring; guidepin at centre; length 18-24mm (-4mm from measured)
Q15Describe the dorsal open approach to the scaphoid.▸
  • Longitudinal incision over Lister tubercle, between the 3rd and 4th compartments, between EPL and EDC
  • Incise extensor retinaculum and dorsal capsule up to the DIC; flex the wrist over a bolster to reveal the proximal pole
  • Danger: superficial branch of radial nerve, dorsal carpal branch of radial artery
  • Pros: can address SL, also good for perilunate dislocation
Q16Describe the volar (Russe) approach to the scaphoid.▸
  • Incision along FCR then towards the scaphoid tubercle
  • Incise RSC (preserve the RSC stump to prevent humpback) and long radiolunate ligament
  • Pros: good exposure, correct humpback, avoids the dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery
  • Cons: radial artery at risk
Q17What is a good lateral (SPC) view and how is displacement measured?▸
  • SPC view: volar cortex of pisiform should lie between the middle 1/3 of the interval between volar cortex of scaphoid and capitate
  • Displacement >1mm = displaced
  • Radiolunate angle >15deg dorsal = DISI; capitolunate >15deg volar = VISI
  • Intra-scaphoid angle >35deg = humpback deformity
Q18On PA and AP wrist views, where is the ulnar styloid seen?▸
  • PA view: ulnar styloid is peripheral (ulnar)
  • AP view: ulnar styloid is central
Q19If a scaphoid fracture is suspected but not seen on initial X-ray, what is the next step?▸
  • Scaphoid series: PA, lateral, ulnar deviated (scaphoid view), oblique PA with wrist extension 20deg + ulnar deviation 20deg, 45deg pronation and supination
  • If still negative: thumb spica cast and repeat scan in 2/52
  • Consider CT and MRI
Q20Which approach is used for fixation of an undisplaced scaphoid fracture?▸
  • Distal fracture: volar percutaneous
  • Proximal fracture: dorsal percutaneous
Q21What is a Herbert screw?▸
  • A headless compression screw used for scaphoid fixation
  • It has a differential pitch
Q22How does the Herbert screw achieve interfragmentary compression?▸
  • The lead of the leading (distal) thread is larger than the trailing (proximal) thread
Q23Describe the X-ray findings of scaphoid nonunion.📷▸
Scaphoid nonunion
Scaphoid nonunion
  • Scaphoid fracture with sclerosis and cystic change
  • Relevant negatives for malalignment/SNAC: no obvious radial styloid arthritis, no carpal collapse, Gilula lines intact
Q24What investigations are used in scaphoid nonunion and why?▸
  • XR lateral and scaphoid series: humpback deformity, displacement, DISI
  • CT 1mm cuts: cyst, bone stock, deformity
  • MRI with contrast: proximal pole AVN
Q25What is the natural history and pathoanatomy of scaphoid nonunion?▸
  • Natural history is predictable: 97% arthrosis in 5 years, 90% symptomatic
  • Distal scaphoid flexes, capitate is pulled proximally, compression on scapholunate -> SC arthritis
Q26What are the principles of scaphoid nonunion surgery?▸
  • Debridement of necrotic bone and exposure of a healthy vascularised bed
  • Alignment: correction of scaphoid malalignment
  • Biology: bone grafting
  • Mechanical stability: stabilisation
Q27Which bone graft is chosen in scaphoid nonunion with AVN or deformity?▸
  • AVN -> vascularised bone graft: dorsal 1,2 ICSRA, volar radial carpal artery
  • Deformity -> opening wedge interposition graft (Fisk)
  • No deformity -> cancellous graft (arthroscopic) or modified Russe inlay cortical graft
  • OA/SNAC at presentation -> non-salvageable
Q28Which surgical approach is preferred for scaphoid nonunion?▸
  • Mostly volar, as it causes less disruption to the dorsal carpal branch of the radial artery
Q29What history is important in scaphoid nonunion?▸
  • Age, hand dominance, functional demand, occupation, smoking
  • Mode and time of injury, treatment received
  • Symptoms
Q30What is the surgical aim in scaphoid nonunion?▸
  • Realign the fracture and promote union with bone graft + stable fixation
Q31Describe the X-ray findings of a stage III SNAC wrist.▸
  • Scaphoid nonunion with OA change at the radial styloid and distal scaphoid, scaphocapitate and capitolunate joints
  • Collapsed carpal height as indicated by Nattrass and Youm indices
  • Lateral: increased SL angle (may be due to humpback deformity) and increased capitolunate angle -> DISI deformity
Q32How is SNAC wrist managed by stage?▸
  • I: radial styloidectomy + excision of distal scaphoid
  • II: excision of radial styloid + 4 corner fusion or PRC
  • III: four corner fusion
  • Pan arthritis: wrist fusion
Q33What is the aim and technique of four corner fusion?▸
  • Eliminate the arthritic midcarpal joint (usually capitolunate)
  • Maintain carpal height
  • Also fuse hamate and triquetrum to increase fusion rate
  • Fusion rate also depends on smoking status
Q34When can PRC be used in SNAC and what are its drawbacks?▸
  • SNAC 2 with SC joint arthritis and intact midcarpal (LC) joint
  • Decreased carpal height may cause decreased grip strength and risk of future OA
Q35What is the aim and what are the means of surgery in SNAC wrist?▸
  • Aim: removal of the pain generator +/- maintain carpal height in 4 corner fusion
  • Means: excisional arthroplasty / limited fusion / wrist fusion
Q36Why is the lunate relatively resistant to osteoarthritis?▸
  • The lunate is spherical; even if orientation is disrupted it is unlikely to develop OA

Fact check

Untreated scaphoid nonunion causes arthrosis in 97% within 5 years — imprecise — The 97% figure (Ruby 1985) applied to nonunions already at least 5 years old in a symptomatic series; a 102-case series found 22% arthritis at <5 years, 75% at 5-9 years and 100% at >=10 years. It is not '97% by 5 years'. — (medium confidence) — source