FRCS Revision

This site is private

Enter the password to open the revision library.

Personal revision library · not clinical advice
FRCSRevision
Home / Spine Non Trauma / Spine imaging modalities
Spine Non Trauma

Spine imaging modalities

Role of CT, contrast-enhanced MRI and myelography in spinal assessment

19 questions 3 source pages 1 images

Images appear with the first question taken from each source page — tap a question to open it.

19 questions
Q1Describe the CT/XR findings in cervical myelopathy.📷▸
Describe CT/XR:
Describe CT/XR:
  • Degenerative changes with osteophyte formation and mixed-type OPLL; kyphosis (K line/ C2-C7 angle)
  • Canal stenosis: absolute <10mm, relative 13mm
  • Pavlov ratio <0.8; Penning's jaw diameter <12mm suggests a congenital stenosis component
  • Occupancy ratio >0.4 = poor prognosis
  • Mizuno XR classification for OPLL: segmental, continuous, mixed, circumscribed/localized (at disc)
Q2Describe the MRI findings in cervical myelopathy.▸
  • Multi-level stenosis with compression from both anterior and posterior (disc, bulging, ossified PLL/yellow ligament)
  • Kyphosis
  • Cord edema
Q3What are the causes of cervical myelopathy and its poor prognostic factors?▸
  • Causes: spondylosis (anterior PID, calcified/buckled PLL, Luschka osteophytes; posterior calcified/buckled YL), OPLL, instability (e.g. C1/2), worsened by congenital narrowing (Pavlov <0.8)
  • Poor prognosis: age >70, chronic symptoms >6 months, JOA <9, multiple levels, canal <30mm2, cord signal (T1 hypo/T2 hyper), compression ratio <0.4
Q4What is the natural history of cervical myelopathy and OPLL?▸
  • Clark: 70% stepwise, 20% gradual, 10% sudden deterioration then plateau
  • Matsunaga Spine 2012 OPLL: 20% myelopathy at presentation, 20% develop symptoms, 70% asymptomatic
  • Risk of myelopathy: >60% canal stenosis by OPLL and laterally deviated-type OPLL on CT
  • Bad CT: C sign = high risk of dural tear
Q5How do you choose the operative approach (PAINS)?▸
  • Assess: axial neck pain/ radiculopathy, alignment (rigid kyphosis, K line), instability, number of levels, site of pathology
  • 1-2 levels: ASF or ASD if no instability
  • >3 levels without rigid kyphosis: posterior (laminectomy + fusion if axial neck pain/instability, else laminoplasty)
  • >3 levels with kyphosis: anterior + posterior (anterior to realign/decompress, posterior to decompress/fuse)
  • K line: K+ no instability = laminoplasty; K+ instability = laminectomy + fusion; K- = A+P
  • Conservative: analgesics for neck pain, physio; advise operation if JOA <=13 as symptoms usually progress
Q6What are the complications of laminoplasty, and how does it compare with laminectomy and fusion?▸
  • Complications: fracture hinge, spring back of hinge, C5 palsy, axial neck pain, late kyphosis
  • Laminoplasty advantages: motion preserving (30-40% motion loss quoted), less morbidity, no instrumentation, shorter rehab
  • Laminectomy + fusion advantages: may relieve neck pain; OPLL may resolve after stabilisation
Q7What history is taken in cervical myelopathy?▸
  • Age, demand, history of DM, chief complaint and progress
  • Axial neck pain and radicular pain
  • Function by JOA: use of chopsticks/spoon, walking on level ground/stairs/walking aids, sphincter condition, numbness of UL, trunk and LL
  • Trauma and red flag signs
Q8What does the physical examination include in cervical myelopathy?▸
  • Power, sensation, jerks, myelopathy hand signs, long tract signs
  • Lhermitte, Spurling, Romberg/tandem walking
  • PR examination and jaw jerk
Q9What investigations are performed in cervical myelopathy?▸
  • XR oblique views and flexion/extension views
  • CT for extent of OPLL and the double layer sign
  • MRI for cause, level and severity of stenosis
Q10What is the pathology of OPLL?▸
  • Mass of woven and lamellar bone plus fibrocartilage
Q11What is the neurological recovery after surgery for cervical myelopathy (Cheung 2008)?▸
  • Cheung WY Int Orthop 2008: neurological recovery in 71% of patients
  • Plateau at 6 months
  • Best in upper limbs, then lower limbs; worst with sphincter dysfunction
Q12What is the pseudoarthrosis rate after anterior cervical surgery?▸
  • Without anterior plate: one level 0-5%, two level 10-20%, three level 30-60%
  • With anterior plate: one level 0-5%, two level 0-3%, three level 0-7%
Q13What is the incidence of adjacent segment disease and the evidence for ADR?▸
  • Adjacent segment disease: 25% within the first 10 years
  • BJJ Findlay 2018: meta-analysis of 14 RCTs, follow-up 2-10 years
  • TDR as effective as ACDF and superior for some outcomes; TDR > ACDF at 2 years and also 4-7 years
  • Reduces the risk of adjacent segment disease (ACDF ASD 1.6-4.2% per year)
Q14What are the criteria, technique, advantages and disadvantages of ADR?▸
  • Strict criteria: no significant neck pain, no facet arthritis, anterior compression only, no instability, good bone stock (no osteoporosis)
  • Technique: alignment of COR in coronal and sagittal planes, accurate sizing and endplate preparation
  • Advantages: preserve motion, prevent ASD
  • Disadvantages: implant failure/migration; easy to overstuff -> posterior neck pain (increased facet loading)
Q15What is the role of gadolinium contrast MRI in spinal infection?▸
  • Differentiate infection from tumour
  • Differentiate epidural abscess from CSF - both are high signal on T2
  • Gadolinium enhance pus in T1, CSF remains low signal
Q16How is an epidural abscess managed?▸
  • Laminectomy and drainage because pus is predominantly posterior
  • Anterior and posterior decompression if concomitant vertebral osteomyelitis
Q17How is a myelogram performed?▸
  • Under fluoroscopy
  • Spinal needle at L3/4, withdraw CSF, inject contrast
  • Table tilt to allow contrast to fill up and down
  • Then XR/CT
Q18How do you interpret an extradural space-occupying lesion on myelogram?▸
  • Examples: PID, metastasis, TB abscess
  • Paintbrush appearance
Q19How do you interpret an intradural, extramedullary lesion on myelogram?▸
  • Examples: neurofibroma, meningioma
  • Meniscal sign (can outline the SOL)