FRCS Revision

This site is private

Enter the password to open the revision library.

Personal revision library · not clinical advice
FRCSRevision
Home / Statistics / Osteosarcoma case - assessment and staging
Statistics

Osteosarcoma case - assessment and staging

Describing an osteosarcoma case: staging systems, pathological features, disease factors.

45 questions 8 source pages 1 images 1 fact-check flags

Images appear with the first question taken from each source page — tap a question to open it.

45 questions
Q1What does the lecturer advise about these tumour revision notes?▸
  • Refer to Orthobullets for more details
  • These notes are not comprehensive
  • Remembering all Orthobullets tumours may only gain 1-2 more MCQs
Q2Which staging classification is used for bone and soft tissue tumours?▸
  • Bone benign/malignant: Enneking
  • Soft tissue sarcoma: AJCC
  • STC: AJCC
Q3What do AJCC stages I-IV mean?▸
  • I: low grade
  • II: high grade
  • III: deep to fascia
  • IV: lymph node/metastasis
Q4What are the Enneking stages for malignant bone tumours?▸
  • I: low grade
  • II: high grade
  • III: metastasis
  • A: intra-compartmental, B: extra-compartmental
Q5What is the Enneking classification for benign bone tumours?▸
  • 1: latent
  • 2: active
  • 3: aggressive
Q6Describe the X-ray findings of this skeletally immature knee.📷▸
Describe
Describe
  • Lytic lesion in the metaphyseal region of the distal femur with destruction of the lateral cortex
  • Wide zone of transition with periosteal reaction medially
  • Matrix is osseous and does not cross the physis
  • Associated soft tissue swelling
Q7What is your impression and what X-ray do you request next?▸
  • Aggressive left distal femoral lesion; concerned about osteosarcoma
  • I want XR of the whole femur to look for obvious skip lesions
  • Other DDx: Ewing sarcoma, haematological (e.g. lymphoma), infection/osteomyelitis
Q8What are the poor prognostic factors in osteosarcoma?▸
  • Advanced stage of disease (most predictive)
  • Age >40 at diagnosis; male sex
  • <90% necrotic index; positive surgical margins
  • Tumour site and size; vascular involvement
  • Expression of p glycoprotein (P-glycoprotein); high ALP and LDH
Q9How would you investigate this lesion?▸
  • Aims: establish the diagnosis and stage the disease
  • Bloods: Hb, WBC, platelets, clotting, ALP (bone turnover), LDH (cell turnover), ESR, CRP
  • Local imaging: whole-bone X-ray 2 views, MRI with contrast (skip lesions, joint/physis involvement, NV bundle proximity)
  • Systemic staging: CT thorax + bone scan
  • Image-guided biopsy at a tertiary tumour centre - representative tissue with minimal contamination
  • Discuss the case at the MSK oncology MDT
Q10What is the management principle and neoadjuvant chemotherapy plan?▸
  • Oncologic clearance with preservation of the limb and function if possible: save life (systemic control), save limb (local control)
  • Principle: Margin free excision (resect all inflammatory zone and go through cuff of normal tissue)
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4 reasons; no proven survival effect vs post-op chemo alone)
  • 2 cycles pre-op MAC: methotrexate, adriamycin, cisplatin; 4-week cycles
  • Restaging MRI, then OT; continue adjuvant chemo and amend by necrotic index
  • Good responder (90-100%): 3 more cycles; poor responder: VP16 + ifosfamide with 5 cycles (EURAMOS1 2016 does not support this - toxicity without EFS benefit)
Q11What are the relative contraindications to limb salvage and the allograft 'terrible triad'?▸
  • Major NV encasement
  • Pathological fracture with haematoma violating compartment boundary
  • Inappropriately performed biopsy
  • Severe infection in surgical field; immature skeleton with predicted LLD >8cm
  • Extensive muscle/soft tissue involvement; poor response to chemo
  • Allograft terrible triad: fracture, infection, non-union (15% each); host bone ingrowth only 1-2mm/year
Q12What history and examination findings are relevant in suspected osteosarcoma?▸
  • History: PMHx, constitutional symptoms
  • Local PE: soft tissue status, NV status, LLD, any knee effusion
  • Systemic PE: listen to lungs
Q13What are the prerequisites for limb salvage and the principle of reconstruction?▸
  • Prerequisites: clear margins, durable and useful limb, limited morbidity, equal oncological outcome
  • Reconstruction principle: stable, painless, durable, mobile limb
Q14What are the options for reconstruction after tumour resection?▸
  • Biological: autograft or allograft
  • Metallic implant: modular or custom-made
  • Combined reconstruction
Q15How is a biopsy taken and how does percutaneous compare with incisional biopsy?▸
  • Options: percutaneous image-guided, incisional, excisional; most people now do percutaneous image-guided biopsy
  • True-cut biopsy x3 vs FNAC: architecture obtained 70% vs 9%
  • Incisional: GA, bigger/deeper wound with more bleeding, but a better chunk of tissue
  • Percutaneous may be inconclusive (reactive zone, central necrosis) - radiologically representative tissue may not be histologically representative
  • Better performed by the surgeon who will do the final excision
Q16What are the intra-operative and post-operative principles of biopsy?▸
  • Pre-op: bloods + imaging
  • Intra-op: tourniquet without exsanguination, longitudinal incision, cross the least compartments, avoid NV structures, aim at representative tissue
  • Oval shape if bone; send for frozen section + microbiology
  • Careful haemostasis, drain in line, suture with small bites
  • Post-op: bed rest +/- protection, Abx (antibiotics)
Q17When is an excisional biopsy appropriate?▸
  • Clinically benign lesion: small, superficial to fascia
  • Incisional and excisional biopsy margins are similar to the definitive surgery (1-2cm)
Q18What histological features suggest osteosarcoma on H&E?▸
  • Pleomorphic spindle cells with lacey osteoid
  • high nuclear cytoplasmic ratio (high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio), cellular atypia
  • Multiple mitotic bodies
Q19How is limb length discrepancy approached in tumour patients?▸
  • Key considerations: growth potential and articular involvement
  • Options: growing prosthesis, lengthening, growth plate transfer, amputation, Van Nes rotationoplasty
  • Van Nes indication: major bone/soft tissue involvement without NV involvement
  • Used to change a high AKA to a BKA
Q20What novel treatments are being studied for metastatic osteosarcoma?▸
  • Almost half of current trials evaluate immunotherapies such as mifamurtide, IL-2, PD-1 inhibitors
  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors including regorafenib
Q21What are the properties of allograft reconstruction?▸
  • Host bone grows into donor bone slowly: 1-2mm/year
  • Strength decreases by 50% at 10 years
  • Worse with allograft arthrodesis
  • APC usu in prox humerus and proximal tibia (tendon attachment to prosthesis difficult)
Q22What is the prognostic significance of a pathological fracture in osteosarcoma?▸
  • Pathological fracture itself increases local recurrence and decreases survival
Q23What does the Scully case series show regarding limb salvage in osteosarcoma with pathological fracture?▸
  • Limb salvaging surgery does not decrease survival in carefully selected patients
Q24What does the JBJS 2014 meta-analysis show regarding local recurrence after pathological fracture in osteosarcoma?▸
  • Metanalysis JBJS 2014 - no statistical difference in local recurrence
Q25What makes a pathological fracture in osteosarcoma amenable to limb salvage?▸
  • Respond to chemo
  • # healing
  • MRI confirmed salvageable
Q26What are the types of osteosarcoma?▸
  • Primary: intramedullary, telangiectatic, parosteal, periosteal
  • Secondary: Paget's disease, fibrous dysplasia, post-irradiation
Q27What is the classical X-ray appearance and DDx of osteosarcoma?▸
  • Distal femur medullary region, wide transitional zone with bone formation and excessive periosteal reaction
  • Codman's triangle and sunburst appearance
  • DDx: infection, Ewing (young), metastasis (old), haematological malignancy
Q28What is the management plan and chemotherapy regime for osteosarcoma?▸
  • Principle: oncological clearance with limb preservation if possible, without sacrificing tumour margin
  • Systemic control (chemo) + local control (surgery); regime neoadjuvant chemo / OT / chemo
  • 2 cycles pre-op (MTX, vincristine + cisplatin); reassessment (clinical, MRI, PET-CT); OT at week 10
  • Good response: 4 more cycles; poor response: change regime, 3w x 8 cycles
Q29What are the indications for amputation in osteosarcoma?▸
  • Surgeon factor: not competent for limb reconstruction surgery
  • Patient factor: not fit for prolonged/multiple surgery or not fit for rehab
  • Disease factor: cannot achieve margin-free excision, or infection
Q30What is the necrotic index and its prognostic value?▸
  • Percentage of necrosis in the excised specimen
  • Good response >90%: 80% of patients, 5-year survival 70-80%
  • Bad response: 5-year survival 40-50%
  • Guides the adjuvant chemotherapy regime
Q31How is a pathological fracture in osteosarcoma managed?▸
  • Amputation is safe but not a must
  • Reassess with MRI to see whether margin-free wide local excision is achievable
  • Scully case series: pathological fracture has higher local recurrence and decreased survival, but limb salvage does not increase recurrence/death in carefully selected patients
  • Prognosis better if healing present
Q32What are the options for managing a bone defect after tumour resection?▸
  • Amputation (soft tissue + bone + NV involvement)
  • Van Nes rotationoplasty (soft tissue + bone involved, NV intact)
  • Reconstruction: biological (autograft/allograft), metallic implant (modular/custom made), or combined
Q33What determines the choice between limb salvage and limb sacrifice for local control?▸
  • Limb salvage possible if it does not affect oncological outcomes, there is a functional limb, and the risk of surgery is acceptable
  • Options include joint/physis-preserving surgery
  • Local control is achieved by surgery: limb salvaging vs limb sacrificing
Q34What disease factors determine prognosis?▸
  • Stage, location, size, grade, type, pathological fracture
  • Assessed alongside biochemical and treatment-response factors
Q35What biochemical and treatment-response factors determine prognosis?▸
  • Biochemical: ALP, LDH
  • Response to treatment: chemoresponse
Q36What is the effect of a pathological fracture on recurrence in osteosarcoma?▸
  • Associated with an increased recurrence rate
  • Also associated with worse prognosis
Q37Does limb salvage affect survivorship after a pathological fracture?▸
  • No - limb salvage surgery does not affect survivorship
  • Therefore pathological fracture is not an absolute contraindication to limb salvage
Q38What radiographic features of this pelvic lesion suggest a chondroid origin?▸
  • Sclerotic, well-defined lesion adjacent to the pubic symphysis
  • Associated flocculent calcification (chondroid matrix)
  • No cortical erosion, scalloping or periosteal reaction
  • Overall suspicious for chondrosarcoma
Q39What is the DDx for a chondral lesion at the pubic rami?▸
  • Chondroblastic osteosarcoma
  • Enchondroma
  • Fracture callus
  • Synovial chondromatosis
  • Fibrous dysplasia with cartilaginous differentiation
Q40How do you differentiate a benign from a malignant chondral lesion?▸
  • Clinical: growth after puberty, new symptoms e.g. pain
  • Imaging: cartilage cap >2cm, soft tissue component, cortical breakage/erosion
  • Histology: enlarged chondrocytes with multinucleated lacunae, high N:C ratio, disorganization, hypercellularity
  • Diagnosis requires clinical + histological correlation (same histology may be benign in the hand but malignant in long bones)
Q41How is treatment of chondrosarcoma decided?▸
  • Treatment depends on grading
  • Grade 1 in pelvis: intralesional curettage or wide excision
  • Grade 2-3: wide local excision
  • Chemotherapy is useful only in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma
Q42What is the prognosis of chondrosarcoma by grade?▸
  • Grade 1: 90%
  • Grade 2: 70%
  • Grade 3: 30%
  • Undifferentiated: 10%
Q43Which benign lesions can progress to chondrosarcoma?▸
  • Exostosis/enchondroma: 1%
  • MHE: 10%
  • Ollier's disease: 25-40%
  • Maffucci: 100%
Q44What history, examination and investigations are needed for a chondral lesion of the pubic rami?▸
  • Hx/PE: other masses, duration and progress of symptoms
  • Ix: blood test, MRI with contrast (soft tissue extension, cartilage)
Q45Why are PE and X-ray important in enchondroma?▸
  • Enchondroma: PE is important to differentiate - the difference between PE and X-ray is cartilage cap size
  • Important to X-ray the pelvis (cannot see otherwise)

Fact check

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma is MTX + vincristine + cisplatin (2 cycles pre-op) — erroneous regimen — Standard neoadjuvant regimen is MAP: high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cisplatin; vincristine is not part of standard osteosarcoma regimens (source 118 correctly lists methotrexate, adriamycin, cisplatin) — source